Posts Tagged ‘sci-fi’

The Future, as Seen Through EVE Online

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

I have recently begun playing EVE Online. This is because I am a nerd, and I like shooting things with spaceships. Explosions are fun. Everyone knows that.

But more than that, EVE represents a unique object in a world of so few unique objects. The MMORPG world consists more or less of tiny insects scurrying surreptitiously between the feet of a hulking colossus, hoping fervently that World of Warcraft will not deem them a threat and crush them beneath his gargantuan feet. EVE Online, however, isn’t a part of this picture.

As one of the longest running MMORPGs in existence, EVE is unique because it operates in a completely different way than World of Warcraft and most of the others in the genre. Missions, questing and stories do exist, but for the most part, the world is run and operated by players. All of the market sales are player driven and the economy is purely run by people mining, crafting and PvPing. It is a surprisingly well crafted economy in a well crafted game.

What is important about this is that EVE has a devoted playerbase - less, by far than World of Warcraft - but not at all insignificant - of about three hundred thousand people. These people have been running this world, crafting, exploring and building, expanding known space and pushing boundaries further and further. Like Second Life, it is a persistent, player run world, but exists in a completely unique setting.

I think that we will see this come to be the model for a new type of human interaction in the near future - one based around immersive, virtual worlds - while people may denigrate MMOs for being escapist and time-wasting, they are a social interaction in and of themselves, and EVE Online may come to be the mold for future models of this phenomenon.

(And because I’m not too proud to shamelessly self-plug, here are a couple of guides I wrote: 1 and 2)

Thoughts on Battlestar Galactica

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Since Battlestar Galactica has recently ended, and it was more or less the only sci-fi show on television with any integrity when it came to dealing with serious science fiction topic, I feel that it deserves a little bit of a review. Despite my irritation that it only ran four seasons and ER is finishing up its fifteenth, I feel that BSG had a pretty good run, and stands as one of the few triumphs of science fiction television. So here are some thoughts. (NOTE: Spoilers ahead)

Cylons

Important philosophical quandary, or just eye candy?

Important philosophical quandary, or just eye candy?

The new BSG took a step in an entirely  new direction with the Cylons when the restarted the franchise, replacing the clunky plastic robots with sexy women possessing uncontrollable libidos. While I secretly suspect that all the foreshadowing, mysticism and God-talk was just an excuse for the directors to write an overwhelming number of scenes with Tricia Helfer whispering innuendos into Baltar’s ear, there are a number of things to be considered. First, there is the obvious Blade Runner question: what separates man from machine? If a perfect human replica was created, would we be able to tell the difference, and would it matter? (And of course, the most important question, could we have sex with it?)

BSG operates on the premise that there is not a whole lot of difference between the cylons and humans,  and especially by the end of the series, they come to be accepted as equals, more or less. Actually, the writers kind of pass over this issue without dealing with it. The humans are vehemently opposed to the very existence of cylons, and then, without really dealing with the issue, they kind of just accept the presence of Athena and later the final five. No big deal. No one on the show really asks the important questions about the nature of human existence, and the differences (if there are any) between them and the cylons. They just kind of feel it out, acting largely emotionally, which is rather unsatisfying.

Still, I think that it’s an important question. As AI technology advances, this question is going to become more important and less theoretical. And maybe when our robot masters watch Battlestar Galactica and see our sexy representation of them, it will sate their burning desire to murder us and use our bodies for fuel.

Proto-Luddites

Advanced technology has brought us space flight, longer life spans and sexy robots. But clearly we should give it all up and live like monkeys.

Advanced technology has brought us space flight, longer life spans and sexy robots. But clearly we should give it all up and live like monkeys.

When the colonial fleet finally reaches (new) Earth, they come to a decision. They will break the cycle of human builds robots, robots and humans kill each other, by flying their fleet into the sun, throwing their technology away and going to live among the prehistorical humans of this world. While the motivations behind this action are, at best, strange, and at worst, fucking stupid, it does raise a number of interesting questions. (I could talk to you about the interesting take on Neitzche’s idea of eternal return, but falling asleep at your keyboard makes all sorts of funny lines on your face, and I don’t want that)

Actually, it raises an interesting question. Scientists (and other, less intelligent people) have been asking if we are capable, morally, of dealing with the technology we have created. Einstein said, “It has become appalingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity” (As evidence of this I would like to point to the abundance of fart applications on the iPhone). While this may or may not be true, it is an interesting choice that the humans of the colonies make in the final of Battlestar Galactica. While it may seem strange that the writer of a science blog would respect this decision, it is a valid point they make. All too often we make technological advances because we can, without ever stopping to ask if we should (Figure out what movie I stole that from and earn a virtual cookie). While I don’t advocate a primitive technology purge or anything of the sort, I would strongly encourage humanity as a whole to think a little harder about the ramifications of what it is they are doing when they advance their science.

Though I will say, that despite all that, the weird robot montage at the end of Battlestar Galactica was pretty stupid. Is that the note you want to end on? Fear the robots?

Death by Tech: Fermi Paradox

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

This week on Death by Tech I will be featuring another somewhat obscure death scenario: aliens! Stay tuned…

What is it?

The basis of this idea is rooted in the musings of a number of prominent physicists, astronomers and generally smart people. Here is how it goes: first, there is the argument of scale. The Milky Way contains 250 billion stars, and the universe itself has approximately 70 sextillion stars in the visible spectrum alone. Estimates on how many civilizations we might share the galaxy with - based on the Drake equation (which is controversial, at best) - range from 5 to 5000. Enrico Fermi takes this further, assuming that the nature of intelligent life is to explore and expand, and points out that even with slower-than-light space travel, it would take somewhere around five to fifty million years for a civilization to colonize the galaxy. This may seem like a long time, but on a geological time scale it is relatively insignificant. This begs the question, which Fermi so impertinently asks: Where is everybody?

It's quiet. Too quiet...

It's quiet. Too quiet...

This may not seem to have anything to do with death, but bear with me. Theories on why we haven’t seen any signs of alien civilization vary (one of my favorites theorizes that it is the nature of intelligent life to destroy itself) but most people interested in it figure that it is an interesting theoretical problem that will be solved as our technological capabilities increase. But it could be something more insidious.  Here are some of my thoughts on why we haven’t heard from anyone:

Aliens ate their brains. And they're coming for us...

Aliens ate their brains. And they're coming for us...

Or…

OM NOM NOM

OM NOM NOM

Or…

ZERLING RUSH KEKEKEKE

ZERGLING RUSH KEKEKEKE

You get the picture.

Likelihood?

Well, we’re not dead yet. There’s no way to tell, but there is certainly something ominous about the oppressive silence of the universe. It could be that we’re just not advanced enough for anyone to take notice of us (or maybe they have their own form of prime directive), so while the threat is pretty low, as we advance our technology, space could get very dangerous very fast.

Pain Factor?

Another unknown. If it’s alien facehuggers, probably pretty high. If earth is just going to be bulldozed to make room for a galactic superhighway, you probably won’t notice.

Sci-Fi Channel Suffers Collective Brain Anuerism, Passes it Off as Marketing Ploy

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009
Picard has a message for you SyFy

Picard has a message for you SyFy

In a move clearly made by a group of people with more MBAs than brain cells, the Sci-Fi channel has decided to go Web 2.0 all over its core fanbase’s ass and change its name to SyFy. Reasoning?

FTA: “By changing the name to Syfy, which remains phonetically identical, the new brand broadens perceptions and embraces a wider range of current and future imagination-based entertainment beyond just the traditional sci-fi genre, including fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure. It also positions the brand for future growth by creating an ownable trademark that can travel easily with consumers across new media and nonlinear digital platforms, new international channels and extend into new business ventures.”

This means less Battlestar Galactica and Eureka and more Ghost Hunters, ECW, Chase and Mansquito. I am not sure if the people who run the network actually even like science fiction.

Link.

The Singularity and You!

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

You may have heard a little bit about this ’singularity’. You may have asked yourself, ‘what does this singularity have to do with me? What’s all the fuss about’? Well worry not dear reader. I am here to answer all your questions.

Read more!

Why is the Monolith So Angry?

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

Why, you may ask, is the monolith so very angry? Why has our extraterrestrial Prometheus turned his ire upon us? How have we displeased him so much?

I’ll tell you why…