Archive for the ‘humor’ Category

The Future, as Seen Through EVE Online

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

I have recently begun playing EVE Online. This is because I am a nerd, and I like shooting things with spaceships. Explosions are fun. Everyone knows that.

But more than that, EVE represents a unique object in a world of so few unique objects. The MMORPG world consists more or less of tiny insects scurrying surreptitiously between the feet of a hulking colossus, hoping fervently that World of Warcraft will not deem them a threat and crush them beneath his gargantuan feet. EVE Online, however, isn’t a part of this picture.

As one of the longest running MMORPGs in existence, EVE is unique because it operates in a completely different way than World of Warcraft and most of the others in the genre. Missions, questing and stories do exist, but for the most part, the world is run and operated by players. All of the market sales are player driven and the economy is purely run by people mining, crafting and PvPing. It is a surprisingly well crafted economy in a well crafted game.

What is important about this is that EVE has a devoted playerbase - less, by far than World of Warcraft - but not at all insignificant - of about three hundred thousand people. These people have been running this world, crafting, exploring and building, expanding known space and pushing boundaries further and further. Like Second Life, it is a persistent, player run world, but exists in a completely unique setting.

I think that we will see this come to be the model for a new type of human interaction in the near future - one based around immersive, virtual worlds - while people may denigrate MMOs for being escapist and time-wasting, they are a social interaction in and of themselves, and EVE Online may come to be the mold for future models of this phenomenon.

(And because I’m not too proud to shamelessly self-plug, here are a couple of guides I wrote: 1 and 2)

Death by Tech: Loss of Habitation

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Maybe you’re one of those people that laughs when they hear about all the poor little bunnies losing their homes when the bulldozers come through, or maybe you just try and not think too hard about how many fuzzy animals were crushed under the steel boot of progress, but in any case, you may want to try a little harder to be sympathetic. Why? Because it could happen to us.

I'm not sure what you mean by 'that meme is tired dude'...

I'm not sure what you mean by 'that meme is tired dude'...

That’s right ugly kitty. We could all lose the place we live in, not just fluffy bunnies and three-toed sloths.

What is it?

Many science fiction authors have put forward images of a future in which the primary unit of value is computing power. Imagine a future where all but the most entrenched luddites have uploaded into some form of computerized consciousness and the only limit on intelletual and social mobility is the quantity of computing power you have access to. So once all the silicon and other relevant materials have been sucked out of the earth, where do we turn? Well, several more science fiction authors have suggest that in the future we will produce a hypothetical element called computronium, which utilizes, by means of nanotechnology, every last atom to produce computing power. Some radical scenarios suggest that eventually all other elements will be useless, and that our future computer selves (named Vile Offspring by Charles Stross, a name I highly enjoy) will tear apart the entire inner solar system, including the earth itself, to produce more processing power.

Likelihood?

Hard to say. Human civilization has not exactly been one long forward movement. We take a lot of steps backwards too. (You may be familiar with one such millenium long cessation of thought…) So while things like mind transfers and the invention of computronium are theoretically possible in the coming infinite lifetimes of humans, it is hard to tell whether or not we will continue to follow the technological path we’re on. Also, we humans are notoriously sentimental, so we may move on to other sources of raw material before breaking down the earth itself, though this assumes a level of environmental consciousness we haven’t exactly maintained throughout history.

Pain Factor?

Minimal. Unless you count the soul-crushing pain of watching the only home you’ve ever known get chewed up by tiny machines in order to make it easier for Jim the Porn-Entity to spam your virtual inbox for the rest of eternity.

Thoughts on Battlestar Galactica

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Since Battlestar Galactica has recently ended, and it was more or less the only sci-fi show on television with any integrity when it came to dealing with serious science fiction topic, I feel that it deserves a little bit of a review. Despite my irritation that it only ran four seasons and ER is finishing up its fifteenth, I feel that BSG had a pretty good run, and stands as one of the few triumphs of science fiction television. So here are some thoughts. (NOTE: Spoilers ahead)

Cylons

Important philosophical quandary, or just eye candy?

Important philosophical quandary, or just eye candy?

The new BSG took a step in an entirely  new direction with the Cylons when the restarted the franchise, replacing the clunky plastic robots with sexy women possessing uncontrollable libidos. While I secretly suspect that all the foreshadowing, mysticism and God-talk was just an excuse for the directors to write an overwhelming number of scenes with Tricia Helfer whispering innuendos into Baltar’s ear, there are a number of things to be considered. First, there is the obvious Blade Runner question: what separates man from machine? If a perfect human replica was created, would we be able to tell the difference, and would it matter? (And of course, the most important question, could we have sex with it?)

BSG operates on the premise that there is not a whole lot of difference between the cylons and humans,  and especially by the end of the series, they come to be accepted as equals, more or less. Actually, the writers kind of pass over this issue without dealing with it. The humans are vehemently opposed to the very existence of cylons, and then, without really dealing with the issue, they kind of just accept the presence of Athena and later the final five. No big deal. No one on the show really asks the important questions about the nature of human existence, and the differences (if there are any) between them and the cylons. They just kind of feel it out, acting largely emotionally, which is rather unsatisfying.

Still, I think that it’s an important question. As AI technology advances, this question is going to become more important and less theoretical. And maybe when our robot masters watch Battlestar Galactica and see our sexy representation of them, it will sate their burning desire to murder us and use our bodies for fuel.

Proto-Luddites

Advanced technology has brought us space flight, longer life spans and sexy robots. But clearly we should give it all up and live like monkeys.

Advanced technology has brought us space flight, longer life spans and sexy robots. But clearly we should give it all up and live like monkeys.

When the colonial fleet finally reaches (new) Earth, they come to a decision. They will break the cycle of human builds robots, robots and humans kill each other, by flying their fleet into the sun, throwing their technology away and going to live among the prehistorical humans of this world. While the motivations behind this action are, at best, strange, and at worst, fucking stupid, it does raise a number of interesting questions. (I could talk to you about the interesting take on Neitzche’s idea of eternal return, but falling asleep at your keyboard makes all sorts of funny lines on your face, and I don’t want that)

Actually, it raises an interesting question. Scientists (and other, less intelligent people) have been asking if we are capable, morally, of dealing with the technology we have created. Einstein said, “It has become appalingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity” (As evidence of this I would like to point to the abundance of fart applications on the iPhone). While this may or may not be true, it is an interesting choice that the humans of the colonies make in the final of Battlestar Galactica. While it may seem strange that the writer of a science blog would respect this decision, it is a valid point they make. All too often we make technological advances because we can, without ever stopping to ask if we should (Figure out what movie I stole that from and earn a virtual cookie). While I don’t advocate a primitive technology purge or anything of the sort, I would strongly encourage humanity as a whole to think a little harder about the ramifications of what it is they are doing when they advance their science.

Though I will say, that despite all that, the weird robot montage at the end of Battlestar Galactica was pretty stupid. Is that the note you want to end on? Fear the robots?

Death by Tech: Energy Weapons

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

Wired has written extensively about the development of military lasers, and since it was recently announced that such lasers have reached what optimists are calling “military strength” I think it only fitting that this week’s Death by Tech focus on the increasingly likely possibility that your insides will be boiled and fried by advancing armies of laser rifle wielding stormtroopers.

"Pew pew"

"Pew pew"

What is it?

As of right now, military lasers are pretty innocous. The only likely use they will see in the near future is as countermeasures to mortars and rockets, and 105 kilowatts is barely enough power for that particular application. There are significant obstacles to militarization of lasers, mostly in terms of minaturization. Scientists are still working on getting a powerful laser to fit into a small enough space to militarily viable, and powering such a weapon is still difficult. Still, if such obstacles could be overcome, a laser or similiar energy weapon could make its debut on a modern battlefield in a decade or so. But…

Really, modern war is fought and won by treasuries, and if the prevalence of cheap, reliable AK-47s in the hands of militaries around the world tells us anything, it’s that laser rifles are unlikely to  be a mainstream weapon of war (if such a weapon is even ever developed) any time in our lifetimes. It is, however, not impossible to imagine that such a weapon could be useful in one relatively untouched theater of war…

ds2fire111

Likelihood?

As mentioned before, it is highly unlikely that any of us will be on the recieving end of a military grade laser any time soon. There are just too many reasons not to build one, not when bullets keep doing such a good job of killing us already. Still, if we act on the assumption that longevity treatments are coming, it is not inconcievable that sometime in the more distant future, a larger, planet or starship scale laser will  be pointed in your direction. But don’t hold your breath, good old-fashioned projectile weapons have a lot going for them.

Pain Factor?

Depends. If someone pointed one of those 105 kilowatt lasers at you, I guarantee it will hurt like hell, if it even manages to kill you. It will burn your flesh away in tiny increments, which is, as I understand it, pretty damn painful. As the power of such weapons increases the pain factor will probably go down, in fact, and you’ll die a lot faster. At least you have something to look forward to.

Death by Tech: Fermi Paradox

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

This week on Death by Tech I will be featuring another somewhat obscure death scenario: aliens! Stay tuned…

What is it?

The basis of this idea is rooted in the musings of a number of prominent physicists, astronomers and generally smart people. Here is how it goes: first, there is the argument of scale. The Milky Way contains 250 billion stars, and the universe itself has approximately 70 sextillion stars in the visible spectrum alone. Estimates on how many civilizations we might share the galaxy with - based on the Drake equation (which is controversial, at best) - range from 5 to 5000. Enrico Fermi takes this further, assuming that the nature of intelligent life is to explore and expand, and points out that even with slower-than-light space travel, it would take somewhere around five to fifty million years for a civilization to colonize the galaxy. This may seem like a long time, but on a geological time scale it is relatively insignificant. This begs the question, which Fermi so impertinently asks: Where is everybody?

It's quiet. Too quiet...

It's quiet. Too quiet...

This may not seem to have anything to do with death, but bear with me. Theories on why we haven’t seen any signs of alien civilization vary (one of my favorites theorizes that it is the nature of intelligent life to destroy itself) but most people interested in it figure that it is an interesting theoretical problem that will be solved as our technological capabilities increase. But it could be something more insidious.  Here are some of my thoughts on why we haven’t heard from anyone:

Aliens ate their brains. And they're coming for us...

Aliens ate their brains. And they're coming for us...

Or…

OM NOM NOM

OM NOM NOM

Or…

ZERLING RUSH KEKEKEKE

ZERGLING RUSH KEKEKEKE

You get the picture.

Likelihood?

Well, we’re not dead yet. There’s no way to tell, but there is certainly something ominous about the oppressive silence of the universe. It could be that we’re just not advanced enough for anyone to take notice of us (or maybe they have their own form of prime directive), so while the threat is pretty low, as we advance our technology, space could get very dangerous very fast.

Pain Factor?

Another unknown. If it’s alien facehuggers, probably pretty high. If earth is just going to be bulldozed to make room for a galactic superhighway, you probably won’t notice.

Guide: How to Live Forever (Or close enough…)

Sunday, March 15th, 2009

Exclusive (Well, not really) information on how to live forever. Secrets of everlasting life revealed! Want to know more? Read on!

Death by Tech: ‘Basilisk’ Attack (AKA Harmful Sensation)

Monday, March 9th, 2009

In honor of Angry Monolith’s home base being recently overrun by Trojans and rootkits, this week’s Death by Tech will cover a somewhat more esoteric, but extremely deadly, future death scenario: A Basilisk attack.

theparrot

Viewing this image won't kill you. This time.

What is it?

A ‘Basilisk’ or ‘Medusa’ attack is an idea generally attributed to science fiction author David Langford (Check out comp.basilisk for more information). The general idea is that an image is generated that will ‘crash’ a human mind in the same way that a virus can crash a computer. Here’s a technobabble explanation for people smarter than me:

“…the human mind as a formal, deterministic computational system — a system that, as predicted by a variant of Gödel’s Theorem in mathematics, can be crashed by thoughts which the mind is physically or logically incapable of thinking. The Logical Imaging Technique presents such a thought in purely visual form as a basilisk image which our optic nerves can’t help but accept. The result is disastrous, like a software stealth-virus smuggled into the brain.” (wiki)

Though Langford is responsible for the most sophisticated iteration of this idea, it is not unique to his writing. William Gibson, in Neuromancer envisioned an advanced firewall called Black ICE, which would attack the minds of invading hackers, killing them if they weren’t properly prepared. Neil Stephenson’s Snow Crash revolves around the use of a similar mind-hacking device. This kind of attack also receives brief mention in Charles Stross’ Accelerando.

Likelihood?

Right now, pretty small. There’s no very good reason to pour resources or brainpower into developing such a weapon as long as we’re still wearing our fleshbodies and can be killed by simple things like blunt trauma and time. But as we draw nearer to such things as mind uploads and direct neural uplinks, the threat will likely grow. When humans have transcended their physical forms, it will become necessary to create new weapons of war if we want to keep killing each other (as is our general modus operandi). A basilisk is designed to attack, destroy or erase the very mental hardware of a human being - an attack on your very self.

Pain Factor?

Unclear, but it will probably not be small. The images associated with Basilisk attacks are supposed to trigger some inconsistency in the very clockworks of your brain  - you probably won’t know why,  but I imagine it will hurt quite a bit. And then, of course, you’ll die.

Death by Tech: Gray Goo

Thursday, March 5th, 2009

New weekly segment: Death by Tech!

Think the future is all flying cars and cyberspace? Well think again. The future, in addition to bringing a whole slew of useful technologies, carries with it exciting new ways to shuffle off this mortal coil. So in honor of these thrilling developments, this segment will cover a fun and unique way to die every week.

This week: Gray Goo

Smokey the Nanobot: Our first line of defense

Smokey the Nanobot: Our first line of defense

What is it?

Gray goo is a scenario that hinges heavily on self-replicating nanobots. The idea is that somebody creates and releases nanobots with insufficient or weak parameters that fail to stop the nanobots from replicating out of control. The nanobots then start eating shit, and not just the shit they’re supposed to. All the shit. Buildings, trees, people. Everything that can be converted into more material. This produces the ubiquitous ‘gray goo’ which consumes the world and us along with it.

Likelihood?

Unclear. Most nanotech engineers think it’s pretty preposterous, and it would take a monumental human error to make it even likely, but that doesn’t rule it out. Several scientists have speculated that this scenario is not only possible, but likely and dangerous. Most of them are fringe wackos, but not all.

Pain factor?

Very high. Imagine being eaten alive by a predator. It takes big chunks out of your flesh, dismembering you piece by piece.  Now imagine being eaten alive by a billion tiny predators that disassemble you piece by piece on a molecular level. I’m not sure exactly how horrible death would be, but I suspect it’s pretty incomparable.

There you have it! Your first ‘Death by Tech!’. Pretty soon you’ll be prepared to enter the world of the future with anxiety and paranoia, as well you should.

UPDATE: Someone with more resources and artistic skill than me out-funnied this post by making a movie on the same subject. Check it out.

Weekly Monolith - 03/04/09

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

This Week’s Monolith: Easter Island

Stone Temple's Pilot?

Stone Temple's Pilot?

These guys put CNN’s talking heads to shame.

Ha ha ha ha…

Sorry. I need help.

Schrödinger’s lolcats

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

Behold my amateurish photoshop skills!

RADIASHUN LOL

RADIASHUN LOL

Schrödinger’s Cat, for reference.

See more.